Australia: What should I do about the changes to FIFO? HG Industrial & Employment Law Alert: 12 February 2015

In this Alert, Shane Entriken, Special Counsel, provides commentary on the key Queensland LNP and ALP policy positions around FIFO workforces and what it potentially means for current and future projects.

The political landscape is uncertain with the election result in Queensland still undecided. The policies that the Queensland ALP have proposed in relation to the mining sector pose some important considerations for families, business and the State.

One of the key issues for discussion has […]

By | February 15th, 2015 ||

Canada: Ontario Court Adopts Expansive Interpretation Of Family Status Protection Under The Ontario Human Rights Code

The Superior Court of Ontario recently adopted the test for family status discrimination as outlined in the seminal decision,Johnstone v Canada (Boarder Services), 2014 FCA 110 [“Johnstone”]. In Johnstone the Federal Court of Appeal found that family status includes parental responsibilities such as childcare obligations, which we previously blogged about here.

In Patridge v Botony Dental Corp. [2015] OJ No 226, Lee Patridge (“Patridge”) worked as a dental hygienist with the defendant company – Botony […]

By | February 13th, 2015 ||

Balancing Life’s Responsibilities: Canadian Human Rights Developments In The Accommodation Of Family Status

With an increase in the number of dual-income households in Canada, it is not surprising that employers are facing growing demands from workers for flexible work regimes that allow for the fulfillment of childcare obligations. As many parents struggle to meet both work and family obligations, Canada’s legal perspective on the duty to accommodate has expanded, placing an increased onus on employers to accommodate family status, both federally under the Canadian Human Rights Act, […]

By | February 13th, 2015 ||